I think the best way to handle this is for the "gummit" just to take over everything and then they can tell everybody what they can do.
Wait! Wait! If they would do that who would they tax? Oh yeah. The people would still need to rent places to live.
Hnnn. Hasn't this been done before? I just don't understand these political thingsat all.
Good News For New York City
Re: Good News For New York City
roger
I support thread drift.
If God didn't want women to be looked at, He would have made 'em ugly. RAH
I support thread drift.
If God didn't want women to be looked at, He would have made 'em ugly. RAH
- MurphOnMillerAve
- Posts: 18489
- Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 10:18 pm
- Location: Kennywood Park
- Contact:
Re: Good News For New York City
HONDO74 wrote:Roy wrote:HONDO74 wrote:Heat pumps are not the most efficient.. When the temp gets down below a certain mark they switch over to induction. That consumes a lot more electricity.
My heat pump uses gas, for heating.
New York is doing away with fossil fuels. They will be switching over to electric.
If California follows in New York's foot steps you will have to change yours also.
But, but, aren't fossil fuels burned in the production of electricity? The answer to that question is why I have not been able to see the helpfulness of having electric-powered vehicles.
The dichotomy has seemed to me to be:
*get gasoline; burn fossil fuel.
*get electric charge for your vehicle; fossil fuel is burned to make the electricity.
My ears are open (well, technically it's my eyes that are open for...) and my mind is open. Educate me. I'm serious.
The significant difference would be....?
Re: Good News For New York City
MurphOnMillerAve wrote:
If California follows in New York's foot steps you will have to change yours also.
But, but, aren't fossil fuels burned in the production of electricity? The answer to that question is why I have not been able to see the helpfulness of having electric-powered vehicles.
The dichotomy has seemed to me to be:
*get gasoline; burn fossil fuel.
*get electric charge for your vehicle; fossil fuel is burned to make the electricity.
My ears are open (well, technically it's my eyes that are open for...) and my mind is open. Educate me. I'm serious.
The significant difference would be....?[/quote]
I posted this chart before so you can see how NY produces electricity. They get very little from renewables. They say they are going to shut down all fossil fuel power plants and all those buildings in the city will have to change over to electric heating and air conditioning. If so they are going to need a lot more electric power that they are producing now.
Are they going to build more dams or nuclear power plants. If not they better get to clinking on blanketing the state with wind turbines and solar panels.

- Rufus T. Firefly
- Posts: 42150
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 7:52 am
- Location: To be Determined
Re: Good News For New York City
HONDO74 wrote:MurphOnMillerAve wrote:
If California follows in New York's foot steps you will have to change yours also.
But, but, aren't fossil fuels burned in the production of electricity? The answer to that question is why I have not been able to see the helpfulness of having electric-powered vehicles.
The dichotomy has seemed to me to be:
*get gasoline; burn fossil fuel.
*get electric charge for your vehicle; fossil fuel is burned to make the electricity.
My ears are open (well, technically it's my eyes that are open for...) and my mind is open. Educate me. I'm serious.
Not all electricity is produced by fossil fuel use; the elementary school land about 20 miles from my place in PA is now a solar power farm.
The biggest impediment is the unwillingness to change. I have 8 acres that I could use for solar panels.
The parking garages around here now have several re-charging stations per level. someone is missing out on a franchise business.
Nuclear in this country was just beginning to move forward and then Fukushima happened and re-set the terror scale in that avenue. Until the US also changes its policy on recycling nuclear fuel, this option would seem on life support.
If someone throws a stone at you, throw a flower at them. Remember to throw the flower pot with it.
- MurphOnMillerAve
- Posts: 18489
- Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 10:18 pm
- Location: Kennywood Park
- Contact:
Re: Good News For New York City
Thank you for that chart. I didn't know nuclear had become such a significant chunk of the production of electricity.
- Rufus T. Firefly
- Posts: 42150
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 7:52 am
- Location: To be Determined
Re: Good News For New York City
MurphOnMillerAve wrote:Thank you for that chart. I didn't know nuclear had become such a significant chunk of the production of electricity.
Read carefully - it's the percentage of where NYC got its electricity 2+ years ago; not the entire nation.
If someone throws a stone at you, throw a flower at them. Remember to throw the flower pot with it.
Re: Good News For New York City
Rufus,
You have 8 acres that could be used for solar power arrays.
How many of those acres would be needed for your place?
How many would be needed for an average family?
You have 8 acres that could be used for solar power arrays.
How many of those acres would be needed for your place?
How many would be needed for an average family?
roger
I support thread drift.
If God didn't want women to be looked at, He would have made 'em ugly. RAH
I support thread drift.
If God didn't want women to be looked at, He would have made 'em ugly. RAH
- MurphOnMillerAve
- Posts: 18489
- Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 10:18 pm
- Location: Kennywood Park
- Contact:
Re: Good News For New York City
Rufus T. Firefly wrote:MurphOnMillerAve wrote:Thank you for that chart. I didn't know nuclear had become such a significant chunk of the production of electricity.
Read carefully - it's the percentage of where NYC got its electricity 2+ years ago; not the entire nation.
Thankks for the headsupdumbass
Lesson LEARNED.
- Rufus T. Firefly
- Posts: 42150
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 7:52 am
- Location: To be Determined
Re: Good News For New York City
rogruth wrote:Rufus,
You have 8 acres that could be used for solar power arrays.
How many of those acres would be needed for your place?
How many would be needed for an average family?
No idea! But, it seems that these folks living off the grid that read & watch are working with arrays that are their roof top area or a couple of stand along panel.
I'd wager that 8 acres would be more than I need for my house.
But, doing something that's all mine is more than sitting around doing nothing while wringing my hands over it all. There's far too much refusal to really consider options. I can't build a nuclear power plant, but my own solar farm is actually possible.
If someone throws a stone at you, throw a flower at them. Remember to throw the flower pot with it.
Re: Good News For New York City
California is subsidizing solar installations for your home.
Torturers, White Racists, Gay Bashers, Rich Psychopaths.
Re: Good News For New York City
Rufus T. Firefly wrote:rogruth wrote:Rufus,
You have 8 acres that could be used for solar power arrays.
How many of those acres would be needed for your place?
How many would be needed for an average family?
No idea! But, it seems that these folks living off the grid that read & watch are working with arrays that are their roof top area or a couple of stand along panel.
I'd wager that 8 acres would be more than I need for my house.
But, doing something that's all mine is more than sitting around doing nothing while wringing my hands over it all. There's far too much refusal to really consider options. I can't build a nuclear power plant, but my own solar farm is actually possible.
You can't fight city hall . One home owner tried this where i live. He really wanted to go solar. Zoning board said " No way" They had many reasons to shot him down. Water run off was a big one. Each solar panel rack was considered a building/structure. To many buildings per lot size. I can remember his zoning hearing. Our zoning board's statements would have given a stand up comic years of material.
I spend entirely too many hours a day tying my shoes
- Rufus T. Firefly
- Posts: 42150
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 7:52 am
- Location: To be Determined
Re: Good News For New York City
robert. wrote:Rufus T. Firefly wrote:rogruth wrote:Rufus,
You have 8 acres that could be used for solar power arrays.
How many of those acres would be needed for your place?
How many would be needed for an average family?
No idea! But, it seems that these folks living off the grid that read & watch are working with arrays that are their roof top area or a couple of stand along panel.
I'd wager that 8 acres would be more than I need for my house.
But, doing something that's all mine is more than sitting around doing nothing while wringing my hands over it all. There's far too much refusal to really consider options. I can't build a nuclear power plant, but my own solar farm is actually possible.
You can't fight city hall . One home owner tried this where i live. He really wanted to go solar. Zoning board said " No way" They had many reasons to shot him down. Water run off was a big one. Each solar panel rack was considered a building/structure. To many buildings per lot size. I can remember his zoning hearing. Our zoning board's statements would have given a stand up comic years of material.
Got to be Bucks Co., Pa. Only county I know of that would do stuff like this.... Get out of that county and he'd be welcomed.
If someone throws a stone at you, throw a flower at them. Remember to throw the flower pot with it.
Return to “The Club Car Lounge”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 156 guests