bob turner wrote:
I don't think my question is all that deep. I just want to see a coherent reason that underpins my friend's feeling that Putin was justified. I do try to watch a little Fox, but it is incredibly difficult.
Just one reason that doesn't require 30 minutes to understand.
Bob, as you may know, Putin is ex-KGB and survived the fall of the USSR. He's never gotten over that and his recent (2014 forward) conquests on the perimeter of Russia proves that. The plan was to capture the capitol and quickly install a puppet government, an objective not yet achieved and possibly may not be. He wants to re-establish the USSR and be Supreme Leader. He's just not quite as smart nor as ruthless as Stalin was. Russian pipelines flow oil and natural gas across Ukraine, and for that, Russia must pay Ukraine transmission fees, costing Russia money that they wouldn't have to spend if they took Ukraine. Ukraine is huge in wheat, exporting 35% alone to the US, and more all over the world; just part of the Ukrainian economy. Ukraine produces much more, and does well with exports. Russia basically has only gas & oil, (and weapons) to depend on, and without that, they'd have no economy at all. So, you can look up all the facts, and you may find many reasons why it would be advantageous for Russia to seize Ukraine, but there's NOT A SINGLE REASON where it would be JUSTIFIED, and you can tell your friend that for me. Is he a fan of the Socialist State?

