bob turner wrote:By the way, my dentist buddy has a scanner that is accurate enough that he no longer has to stick that giant tray of wax in one's mouth to get an accurate tooth shape. I have no doubt that it could scan a casting with the same accuracy. The question is only cost, and the availability of a metal 3D printer.
Mine as well has moved forward from the wax or "blue goo" that they used to use to take impressions; now it's all scan and 3D print crowns for teeth.
My theory is that ultimately this will happen even on the level of toy trains, and JLC GG1 owners will have good all metal models.
Price will have to come down a lot; I can visualize a time when everyone has a "printer" in their home and access to files, etc. for a cost to download and use x many times.
By the way, we were ready to provide lost wax sideframes in lifetime brass, but the interest went away when Hennings produced the urethane parts.
Urethane would need brass or metal bearing of some sort and over time questions about stability would remain. Maybe a metal filled urethane would work.